Design direction 02 / Evidence NetworkView direction 01

INFRASTRUCTURE DEPENDENCY ASSURANCE

See the system
behind the service.

Stonemark maps the hidden relationships between sites, carriers, routes, contracts, and critical services—then puts a human expert between the evidence and the decision.

/// Verified// Partial/ Thin· Unassessed
EVIDENCE GRAPH / LONDONConsultant view
SOURCE RECORDS
RECONCILIATION
ASSURED STATE
SITEDC1—LondonPrimary data center///
CARRIERPath ARoute verified
CARRIERPath BStatement only
COMMERCIALNetwork MSATerm · 36 months
OPEN QUESTIONShared last mile?Evidence requested
CRITICAL SERVICEPaymentsRTO · 15 minutes
ARCHITECTURE781 shared-fate gap
42 verified facts 3 under review 2 evidence gaps

Illustrative synthetic record

Most enterprises have an inventory.

Few can prove how it is connected,

what will fail together, or why they believe it.

01 / THE EVIDENCE PIPELINE

Every claim has a route
to trusted state.

Like a technical workflow, Stonemark makes every transformation visible. The difference is that the decisive node is human.

INGESTSTAGINGHUMAN REVIEWCANONICALPUBLISH
PDFCarrier routeProvider statement
?Claim extractedOrigin retained
HConsultant verifiesConflict resolved
///Path assertedEvidence linked
Client snapshotPoint in time
XLSSite inventoryClient supplied
Address conflict2 values found
HConsultant decidesReason recorded
///Site recordCanonical
!Gap trackedOwner visible
02 / THE PLATFORM

One evidence graph.
Five ways to see the risk.

SITE REGISTRY

See every location as a living assurance record.

Architecture, evidence, dependencies, commercial context, and open risk—together.

///New York88% evidenced/Madrid30% evidenced//London78% evidenced
CARRIER DIVERSITY

Two logos do not prove two paths.

A?B
READINESS

Connect an outage to the work it interrupts.

Facility outageWAN unavailablePayments at risk
03 / THE ENGAGEMENT

Expert-led from discovery
to an actionable plan.

04 / THE HIGH-AVAILABILITY QUESTION

You’re paying for high availability.

Have your carriers proven the resilience—or simply stated it?

Two providers, two contracts, and two carrier logos can still share the same access provider, conduit, building entrance, facility, or failure domain. Carrier commitments matter. Stonemark verifies what the end-to-end design can actually support.
CONTRACTED“Dual-carrier HA”

What the service order and commercial terms say you purchased.

CLAIMED“Diverse paths”

What provider diagrams, portals, and statements appear to show.

EVIDENCEDFailure domains verified

What route, facility, and dependency evidence can actually support.

KMZ ROUTE EVIDENCE

Two documented routes. One shared point of failure.

Illustrative synthetic KMZ
Carrier route diversity evidence overlayCarrier A and Carrier B follow separate orthogonal route segments but converge at one shared conduit before entering the London site.CARRIER A · CLAIMED DIVERSECARRIER B · CLAIMED DIVERSESHARED CONDUITDC1 · LONDON

Stonemark verifies the resilience behind the HA claim—so you know what you are actually buying.

THE SYSTEM BEHIND THE SERVICE

Know the dependency.
Prove the decision.

Explore the demo ↗Platform sign in